USPTO serial 79048646
POLYCOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYCOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints; colorants; mordent dyes; clear and pigmented coatings used in the nature of paints; anti-staining coatings; waterproofing compounds, preparations and substances, namely, coatings used as industrial sealants for waterproofing and surface hardening; waterproofing preparations and substances; waterproofing compounds, with or without reinforcement materials, namely, water based paint applied to protect surfaces against the deleterious effects of the weather; varnishes, lacquers, anti-fouling compositions, wood preservatives, coatings all having fire-retardant properties; enamel paints; sealants; thinners for all of the aforesaid goods; bitumen varnish ; direct dyes; distempers; mastic; oils for preserving wood; toner for cartridges; primers; whitewash | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials; roofing materials of asphalt and bitumen; non-metallic roofs; asphalt; pitch, bitumen and polyester, cement mixes, bricks; plastic, ceramic and terracotta tiles, terracotta; concrete; coverings not of metal for building and repairing; non-metallic roof lights / skylights; bitumen based sealant for use on decking and flooring ; non-metal roof trims; preparations for repairing walls, roofs and flooring, namely grout and grout coating preparations, tile cement and expanding foam, fillers; non-metallic materials for surfacing decks, floors and the like surfaces, namely veneer for floors and decks, liquid foundation surfacing materials for coating flooring; fabric in the form of tape for strengthening or reinforcing materials used in repairing cracks, joints and the like in buildings or building surfaces; membranes for waterproofing floors included in this class; sand (silica), cement, non-agricultural lime for use in construction, mortar all being building materials; bituminous materials; parquet flooring compositions, plastic flooring compositions, polystyrene flooring compositions; materials for repairing and making roads, namely glass granule; ; cork used in parquet flooring; door castings, not of metal; drain pipes made of ceramic, concrete or plastic; felt for building, namely roofing felt; fences, not of metal; floor tiles, not of metal; gravel; insect screens not of metal; paving blocks, stones and tiles; safety glass for building purposes; roofing materials included in this class; tar; wall and ceiling cladding; prefabricated huts; window and door frames, not of metal; gates, not of metal; surfaces, not of metal for building; window shutters, not of metal; non-mechanical sign, not of metal; materials included in this class for repairing, roofs, floors, ceilings and walls, namely plaster, cement, tile cement, grout and grout coating preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |