USPTO serial 79048651
QIAPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3639651Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QIAPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie Walsh Johnson
Valerie Walsh Johnson Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000Memphis, TN 38103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals and biochemicals for industrial and scientific purposes, namely, nucleic acids for laboratory use and enzymes for scientific and research purposes; kits of chemicals and biochemicals for industrial and scientific purposes containing chemicals and biochemicals for industrial and scientific purposes, namely, nucleic acids for laboratory use and enzymes for scientific and research purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary medical purposes comprising nucleic acids and enzymes; kits of diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary medical purposes containing diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary medical purposes comprising nucleic acids and enzymes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus, instruments and equipment for research, development and examination purposes, namely, automated laboratory equipment, namely, robots for analysis and handling of nucleic acids and enzymes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and development in the fields of chemistry, genetics, biology and biochemistry; diagnostic services in the fields of DNA, RNA and protein detection and analysis; research services in the field of forensics, namely, analysis, detection and isolation of biological substances in forensic samples; design for others in the fields of chemistry, genetics, biology and biochemistry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QIAGEN GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by QIAGEN GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by QIAGEN GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QIAPLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |