Drawing for YUATSUKI RUNNERBREAKER

USPTO serial 79048660

YUATSUKI RUNNERBREAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580689Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with YUATSUKI RUNNERBREAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Armstrong, IV

James E. Armstrong, IV Locke Lord LLPCHURCH STREET STATION; P.O. BOX 1470New York, NY 10008-1470UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machines and metalworking machine tools; pneumatic or hydraulic machines and instruments, namely, waste crushing machines; waste crushing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 30, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 10, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance