USPTO serial 79048682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
78087 Mönchweiler, DE
78087 Mönchweiler, DE
78087 Mönchweiler, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Nath
Gary M. Nath The Nath Law Group112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; portable buildings of metal, non-electric cables and wires of common metal; metal ironmongery and locksmithing articles, namely, metal pulleys, springs and valves not including machine elements; pipes of metal; metal safes; goods of common metal not included in other classes, namely, levers of metal in the nature of metal handles for valves, flanges of metal, awnings of metal, bolts of metal, cans of metal; conical and spherical plug valves and metal turning valves, namely, metal valves not being parts of machines; flow-control valves, namely, manually operated metal valves; metal check valves not being parts of machines and dirt traps of metal for pipe conduits, namely, metal pipe strainers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Special valves being machine parts, namely, conical and spherical plug valves and turn valves of metal or of synthetic materials with flow-control valves, all with interior lining of synthetic materials resistant to corrosion | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Special valves intended for conduit installation for the chemical and petrochemical industry, namely, conical and spherical plug valves and turn valves made of metal or of synthetic materials with flow-control valves, namely, manually operated plumbing valves with interior lining of synthetic materials resistant to corrosion; check valves and dirt traps for use with above-mentioned conduits, in the nature regulating accessories for water supply, namely, metered valves with interior lining of synthetic materials resistant to corrosion; warning lamps for the aforesaid products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealing pipe gaskets made of polytetrafluoroethylene for use on special valves intended for conduit installations for the chemical and petrochemical industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |