Drawing for ROXCEL

USPTO serial 79048713

ROXCEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3635454Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROXCEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine A Rittenhouse

JEANNINE A RITTENHOUSE IPHORGAN LTD.1130 LAKE COOK RDSTE 240BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1994

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, cardboard and goods consisting of such materials, namely, packaging board, woodfree paper and board, brown paper, namely, paper products made from bamboo, esparto grass, rags, straw, synthetic fibers, and paper products made without lignin, corrugated paper, namely, fluting paper, packing material made of corrugated paper, publishing/mechanical paper and specialty papers, namely, bond paper, book-cover paper, carbon paper, carbonless paper, calligraphy paper, construction paper, craft paper, crepe paper, gift wrapping paper, heat sensitive paper, illustration paper, label paper, letterhead paper, luminous paper, magazine paper, blotting paper, book binding paper, cellophane paper, computer paper, copier paper, digital printing paper, drawing paper, envelope paper, facsimile transmission paper, fiber paper, fluorescent paper, graph paper, gummed paper, heat transfer paper, Japanese paper, laminated paper, laser printer paper, masking paper, newsprint paper, note paper, packing paper, paper for photocopies, paraffined paper, parchment paper, plastic coated copying paper, plotting papers, printing paper, proofing paper, recycled bond paper, recycled paper, safety paper, thermosensitive paper, toilet paper, tracing paper, typewriter paper, waterproof paper, wax bond paper, wax paper, wood pulp paper, xerographic paper; greeting cards; wood pulp board for use as stationery; cards, namely, business cards; cardboard; card board articles, namely, detergent boxes; cardboard tubes; waxed paper; blotters; paper for radiograms, namely, cash register paper; stationery; paper ribbons; filter paper; face towels of paper; printed matter, namely, calendars; bags of paper or plastics for packaging; printers' type; printing blocks; apparatuses for laminating of documents for home and office use; inking ribbons; computer printer ink ribbons; typewriter ribbons; spools for inking ribbons, namely, paper or cardboard spools on which inking ribbons are wound; filtering materials, namely, paper filters for coffee makersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functions; publication of publicity texts; evaluation of standing timber; document reproduction; photocopying; dissemination of advertising matterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Transport, namely, freight transport and transport of goods; packaging and storage of goods, namely, services in connection with the packaging and packet assembling prior to transportation and the delivery of goods by mail order; parcel delivery and delivery of goods; delivery of goods by mail orderSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 12, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 17, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 15, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 15, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance