USPTO serial 79048756
SAACKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3757676Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SAACKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as machines for the working and processing of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials, and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials, and component parts for all of the machines; controllers and regulators being a component of machines for the working and processing of materials and for machine tools; power driven chipping tools, power driven non-chipping tools; power driven rolling tools, power driven hobbing tools, power driven milling tools, power driven grinding tools, power driven reaming tools, power driven broaching tools, power driven slotting tools, power driven ramming tools, power driven drilling tools, power driven cutting tools; replacement parts for the afore-mentioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Blank electric, electronic, magnetic and optic data carriers; pre-recorded electric, electronic, magnetic and optic data carriers featuring software for machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials; data processor and computers; electric and electronic controllers and regulators for machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials; data processor and computers; electric and electronic controllers and regulators for machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, of wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials, and machine tools; computer programs for the operation of data processing equipment and computers, for the operation of the afore-mentioned controllers and regulators, and for the operation of machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials; replacement parts for the afore-mentioned goods, included in this class ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Saacke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Saacke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Saacke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SAACKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |