USPTO serial 79048790
PRO FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3564889Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2009
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz MERZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hole saws, hole drills, and milling cutters for hand tools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 17, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |