USPTO serial 79048804
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Slavick
Scott J. Slavick Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL GOODS, NAMELY, SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE CASES, SUNGLASSES, [ ANTI-GLARE SPECTACLES, ] SPORT SPECTACLES, [ LENSES FOR SPECTACLES, MONOCLES, LORGNETTES, ] SPECTACLE FRAMES, [ CONTACT LENSES, ] SKI GOGGLES, SNOW-BOARD GOGGLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ FURNITURE, MIRRORS, ] PICTURE FRAMES [ ; WOODEN WORKS OF ART, WAX, PLASTER, CORK, REED, CANE, WICKER, HORN, BONE, IVORY WHALEBONE, SHELL, AMBER, MOTHER OF PEARL, MEERSCHAUM, SUBSTITUTES FOR ALL THESE MATERIALS, OR OF PLASTICS; COAT HANGERS, CHESTS OF DRAWERS, CUSHIONS, SHELF UNITS, PACKAGING CONTAINERS OF PLASTIC, ARMCHAIRS, CHAIRS, BEDDING EXCEPT LINEN; MATTRESSES, PLATE RACKS; WICKERWORK; BOXES OF WOOD OR PLASTIC ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Jul 28, 2025 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |