USPTO serial 79048805
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
"REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
BG-5300 Gabrovo, BG
Other trademarks owned by "REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
"REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
BG-5300 Gabrovo, BG
Other trademarks owned by "REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
"REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
BG-5300 Gabrovo, BG
Other trademarks owned by "REZBONAREZNI INSTRUMENTI; GABROVO" EOOD
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes; hard metal plates for carbide inserts; semi-wrought common metals, namely, blanks for cutting tools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines for cutting and machine tools, namely, power operated cutting tools for metal and wood cutting; saw benches being parts of machines; circular saws being parts of machines; machines, namely, power hacksaws for metal; cutting machines; wood felling machines; woodworking machines; saw blades being parts of machines; belt-saw blades being parts of machines; woodcutting plane knives being part of cutting machines; knives being parts of machines; knives being part of cutting machines, namely, lathe knives, milling knives and wood-cutting knives with soldered hard metal plates; drilling bits being parts of machines; centering drilling bits being parts of machines; milling cutters being machine tools; taps being machine tools; dies in the nature of machine tools; sink tools in the nature of machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; reamers in the nature of machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; machine hacksaws being parts of machines; blades, namely, lathe blades, milling blades and wood-cutting blades all being cutting parts of machines; sharpening devices, namely, power operated sharpeners for cutters; electric knives and electric scissors; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; incubators for eggs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, hand cutting tools and hand operated implements, namely, blades, files and saws for cutting tools; borers being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; milling cutters being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; taps being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; hoop cutters being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; bits being part of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; reamers being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; hand tools, namely, cutters, saw blades being parts of hand tools in the nature of hand-saws and hand appliances for cutting; profile hand saws; hand tools, namely, clamps for metal bands; vices of metal; planes; carpenters' augers; emery manually operated grinding wheels; hand tools, namely, emery files; hand tools, namely, files; bow hand operated saws; saw blades of metal being parts of hand tools in the nature of hand-saws and hand appliances for cutting; hand tools, namely, drills; razors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |