Drawing for GWG GEWINDEWERKZEUGE GABROVO

USPTO serial 79048805

GWG GEWINDEWERKZEUGE GABROVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3790292Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 18, 2010
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GWG GEWINDEWERKZEUGE GABROVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes; hard metal plates for carbide inserts; semi-wrought common metals, namely, blanks for cutting toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Machines for cutting and machine tools, namely, power operated cutting tools for metal and wood cutting; saw benches being parts of machines; circular saws being parts of machines; machines, namely, power hacksaws for metal; cutting machines; wood felling machines; woodworking machines; saw blades being parts of machines; belt-saw blades being parts of machines; woodcutting plane knives being part of cutting machines; knives being parts of machines; knives being part of cutting machines, namely, lathe knives, milling knives and wood-cutting knives with soldered hard metal plates; drilling bits being parts of machines; centering drilling bits being parts of machines; milling cutters being machine tools; taps being machine tools; dies in the nature of machine tools; sink tools in the nature of machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; reamers in the nature of machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; machine hacksaws being parts of machines; blades, namely, lathe blades, milling blades and wood-cutting blades all being cutting parts of machines; sharpening devices, namely, power operated sharpeners for cutters; electric knives and electric scissors; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; incubators for eggsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Hand tools, namely, hand cutting tools and hand operated implements, namely, blades, files and saws for cutting tools; borers being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; milling cutters being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; taps being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; hoop cutters being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; bits being part of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; reamers being parts of hand tools in the nature of drills and hand appliances for cutting; hand tools, namely, cutters, saw blades being parts of hand tools in the nature of hand-saws and hand appliances for cutting; profile hand saws; hand tools, namely, clamps for metal bands; vices of metal; planes; carpenters' augers; emery manually operated grinding wheels; hand tools, namely, emery files; hand tools, namely, files; bow hand operated saws; saw blades of metal being parts of hand tools in the nature of hand-saws and hand appliances for cutting; hand tools, namely, drills; razorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 21, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 6, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 23, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 18, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance