Drawing for ELIWELL

USPTO serial 79048852

ELIWELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3705398Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 2009
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELIWELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole L. Linehan,

Nicole L. Linehan, Esq. Schneider Electric Intellectual Property Departmen38 Mechanic StreetFoxboro, MA 02035UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic operating apparatus, namely, controllers, measurement and monitoring apparatus composed of electric and electronic circuits; electric and electronic control panels for temperature, pressure and humidity control for residential, industrial and commercial applications; electric and electronic regulators, namely, temperature, pressure and humidity control for residential, industrial and commercial applicationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011[ Automated refrigerating installations, namely, refrigerators for commercial and industrial use; automated drying apparatus, namely, residential and industrial dryers for heating and dehumidifying; automated air conditioning installations, namely, air conditioners, air conditioning panels for use in walk-in coolers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design of new products, namely, drafting plans for operating, regulating and control apparatus and installations for refrigerating, drying and air conditioningSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 15, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 27, 2020CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 31, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 31, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 3, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 16, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 17, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 13, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 13, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 8, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Dec 14, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 3, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 15, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance