Drawing for ZD

USPTO serial 79048907

ZD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical dressings; Gauze for dressings; Hygienic surgical bandages; Bandages for dressings; Medicated compresses; Surgical dressings; Cotton wadding for medical purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 30, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 13, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 13, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 9, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 15, 2009PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
May 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 22, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance