USPTO serial 79048949
QUESTBACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3847919Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2010
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUESTBACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-0255 Oslo, NO
N-0255 Oslo, NO
N-0255 Oslo, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
WILLIAM J. SEITER Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for distributing web based questionnaires and gathering of responses, web based dialogue and feedback related to conducting web based surveys specifically excluding questionnaires, responses, dialogue and feedback related to characteristics and/or performance of computer hardware, software or peripherals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Services related to conducting web based surveys excluding surveys related to characteristics and/or performance of computer hardware, software or peripherals and reporting survey responses, namely, stakeholder feedback and opinion surveys | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Services related to gathering, managing, evaluating and processing information in the field of questionnaires, reports, surveys and feedback related to conducting web based surveys excluding questionnaires, reports, surveys and feedback related to characteristics and/or performance of computer hardware, software or peripherals, namely, product research and development | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Questback AS
- Other trademarks owned by Questback AS
- Other trademarks owned by Questback AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUESTBACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2023 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |