Drawing for LAVITA

USPTO serial 79048970

LAVITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAVITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Elbows of metal for pipes; pipe muffs of metal; junctions of metal for pipes; valves of metal, other than parts of machines; water-pipes of metal; penstock pipes of metal; cocks of metal other than parts of machines; pipe couplings of metal; water-pipe valves of metal; valves of metal, other than for machines; pipe couplings of metal, other than for machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 21, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 9, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 11, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance