USPTO serial 79048996
SBM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3616185Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SBM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AARON N WISE
AARON N WISE GALLET DREYER & BERKEY, LLP845 THIRD AVENUE8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Steel structures, namely, steel support structures used for stationary mineral processing plants; sheet metal structures used as weather protection for machines; roof panels, flashing, sidings and side claddings of metal for constructions and buildings; silos and bins of metal; counter sunk head screws of metal; and metal spare and replacement parts of all said items | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Feeding bins as machines for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid matter processing and recycling, and concrete production industries; crushing machines, impact crushing machines, impact grinding mills, and recycling waste crushing machines used to crush and grind stone, sand, gravel, building materials, rubble, wood, slag, debris, industrial waste, and other solid matter; sorting machines, all for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid matter processing and recycling and concrete production industries, to separate, sieve, screen and classify solid matter, namely, sieving machines, screening machines, grizzlies, classifying machines, wobbler feeders, star screens, trommel screens and dewatering screens; feeding bins as machines constituting a functional part of and for use in feeding, crushing machines, impact crushing machines, impact grinding mills and recycling waste crushing machines; sorting machines to separate, sieve, screen and classify solid matter, namely, sieving machines, screening machines, grizzlies, classifying machines, wobbler feeders, star screens, trommel screens, and dewatering screens machines for use to convey materials, namely, vibratory feeders as machines, apron conveyors, chain conveyors, push feeders as machines, screw conveyors, belt conveyors, tripper cars in the nature of a mobile belt conveyor, reversible conveyors, moveable conveyors, mobile conveyors, liftable conveyors, stacker belt conveyors, screw conveyors; dosing machines, namely, machinery used for dose-regulated loading, charging and batching of solid and aggregate matter, namely, dosing belt conveyors, dosing vibratory feeders as machines for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid matter processing and recycling and concrete production industries, and discharge gates as structural parts of dosing machines; machinery, as structural parts of machines for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid matter processing and recycling and concrete production industries, for draining water, namely, discharge gates, slide gates, pin-hinged gates, and draining screws used in connection with machinery for draining water; bucket wheels, namely, wheels being part of machines equipped with screens that drain water from small particulate material for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid matter processing and recycling and concrete production industries; log washers, namely, machines equipped with paddles used for washing contaminants and impurities out of rock, minerals, and other solid matter for use in the mining, solid and semi-solid processing and recycling and concrete production industries; fine sand re-extracting machinery, namely, sand sorting and cleaning machines; washing trommels, namely, machines used for washing aggregates and gravel; concrete mixing machinery for use to produce concrete; concrete recycling machinery, namely, machinery for use to recycle residual concrete; rotors as structural parts for crushing machines; and metal structural spare and replacement parts for all of the fore going machinery and equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SBM Mineral Processing GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SBM Mineral Processing GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SBM Mineral Processing GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SBM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |