USPTO serial 79048998
REVOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3712148Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Transportable buildings, in particular, lightweight prefabricated halls, aforesaid of metal and light metal; roofing of metal and light metal and roof coverings of metal and light metal, namely, metal roofing tiles; accessories and interior fitting accessories all of metal and light metal for the aforesaid goods, namely, metal floors, prefabricated metal podium platforms, gallery fixtures in the nature of metal frameworks, metal shelf brackets; transportable floors of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Tents for exhibitions and events, sun shading awnings, namely, tarpaulins, rain shelter awnings, all made of textile | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Rental of transportable buildings; rental of transportable buildings and tents; rental of portable modular buildings in the nature of lightweight prefabricated halls | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Losberger Intertent GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Losberger GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Losberger GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Losberger GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named REVOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |