USPTO serial 79048999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
Dormettingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
Dormettingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
Dormettingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Weckenmann Anlagentechnik; GmbH & Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica L. Dias
MONICA L. DIAS FROST BROWN TODD LLC3300 GREAT AMERICAN TOWER, 301 E. 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Concrete shuttering elements out of metal, namely, metal casting forms and metal shuttering rails for concrete [ ; battery moulds out of metal, namely, metal casting moulds for concrete in battery style ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for the manufacturing of concrete parts, namely, concrete fabrication machines in the nature of pallet circulation systems, namely, concrete mixers, and finishing machines, all for the production of floor slabs, walls, façade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams; machine tools, namely, machine tools for the production of floor slabs, walls, façade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams, and pallet circulation systems, namely, concrete mixers for the production of floor slabs, walls, façade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams, and concrete pipes; industrial shuttering robots; mechanical concrete spreaders as machines, namely, concrete placing machines, combined form cleaning, oiling and fullscale plotting machines; concrete construction machines, namely, combined form cleaning and oiling machines for the cleaning and oiling of concrete floor slabs, walls, facade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams as they are fabricated; concrete construction machines, namely, combined shuttering, handling machines in the nature of loading and unloading machines, form cleaning and oiling machines for the cleaning and oiling of concrete floor slabs, walls, facade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams as they are fabricated and for handling the shuttering material needed to form the concrete floor slabs, walls, facade elements, prefabricated rooms, columns and beams; rotor smoothening machines, namely, machines with a horizontally arranged rotor for smoothening freshly poured pre-cast concrete elements; [ machines to plaster prefabricated building elements as walls, facades or floor slabs; ] cleaning and oiling apparatus and machines, namely, concrete mould cleaning and oiling machines, namely, oiling machines for concrete fabrication machines and apparatus; production lines, namely, stationary casting machines to produce pre-cast concrete parts; compacting machines, namely, to compact pre-cast concrete parts after pouring; [ plastic grinders to grind production waste; ] mechanical handling and storage equipment as far as included in this class, namely, mechanical handling and lifting cranes and conveyors as parts of warehouse systems for voluminous parts [ ; concrete construction machines, namely, machines for the processing and handling of reinforced steel, namely, straightening, cutting, handling machines in the nature of loading and unloading machines, and electric welding machines for reinforcement steel used for the production of pre-cast concrete parts ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Clamping magnets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |