Drawing for TARMAK

USPTO serial 79049019

TARMAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARMAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Rucksacks, bags with wheels; bags for climbers, bags for campers, travelling bags, beach bags, school bags; sports bags (other than those adapted for their contents)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear (excluding orthopaedic footwear); socks; headgear; beach, ski or sports footwear; underwear, all these goods being suitable for the practice and playing of sportsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance