Drawing for PDG TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79049056

PDG TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PDG TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield K&L Gates LLP630 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, a drug delivery system comprising solid oral dosage forms in the nature of oral tablets for drugs, vitamins, and dietary supplements for both human and veterinary use; food for babies; plasters and materials for medical dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental waxABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 28, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 28, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 9, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 8, 2009OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance