Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79049060?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79049060. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79049060, the listed owner(s) include: CL Schutzrechtsverwaltungs GmbH, CL Schutzrechtsverwaltungs GmbH, CL Schutzrechtsverwaltungs GmbH.

What is USPTO serial number 79049060?

Serial number 79049060 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING?

DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING (79049060) currently shows USPTO status code 709 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 040, 041, 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING Serial# 79049060 | status 709; last event INNT | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Mennenga

Catherine Mennenga General Electric Company901 Main AvenueGE Global OperationsNorwalk, CT 06851

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Machines and machine tools, namely, automatic laser material treatment machines in the nature of laser sintering machines, stereolithography machines, and variable machine tool holders for laser sinter machines	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
040	Treatment of materials, namely, by laser beam, metal treatment, metal hardening and metal treatment in the nature of sintering and smelting	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
041	Providing of training in the field of laser material treatment; arranging of seminars in the field of laser material treatment; conducting seminars in the field of laser material treatment; arranging and conducting educational conferences in the field of laser material treatment; arranging professional training courses in the field of laser material treatment; conducting educational training courses in the field of laser material treatment; conducting seminars featuring specialist lectures in the field of laser material treatment; conducting seminars featuring specialist lectures in the field of laser material treatment	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
042	Scientific research; engineering; conducting technical project feasibility studies; material testing; construction drafting; product and scientific research in the field of laser material treatment	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 14, 2022	INNT	TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB	—
Dec 15, 2021	INTS	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB	—
Dec 15, 2021	INPC	INVALIDATION PROCESSED	—
Oct 26, 2021	INTR	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED	—
Feb 26, 2021	C71T	CANCELLED SECTION 71	—
Oct 6, 2018	REM4	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED	—
Jun 1, 2018	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
May 30, 2018	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2018	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Mar 8, 2018	RNWL	INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED	—
Jun 2, 2017	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Dec 1, 2015	NA75	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED	—
Dec 1, 2015	C75A	REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	—
Nov 16, 2015	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Oct 6, 2015	ES75	TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED	—
Jan 27, 2013	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Feb 11, 2010	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Feb 11, 2010	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
Jan 6, 2010	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Oct 6, 2009	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 6, 2009	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jul 23, 2009	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jul 23, 2009	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jul 21, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 18, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 16, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 26, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 26, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 26, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2009	GAUN	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Apr 28, 2009	GAUD	NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED	—
Apr 28, 2009	NAUD	REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED	—
Apr 3, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 3, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 3, 2009	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Oct 7, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Oct 7, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 6, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 6, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 27, 2008	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Aug 27, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Mar 3, 2008	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Mar 3, 2008	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Mar 1, 2008	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Feb 29, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 22, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Feb 21, 2008	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

DIRECT CUSING MANUFACTURING