USPTO serial 79049086
SIFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3689479Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SIFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAVINAIO, IT
LAVINAIO, IT
ACI SANT'ANTONIO (CT), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | [ Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, pharmaceutical preparations to be used in the field of ophthalmology for the treatment of eye diseases, namely, corneal abrasions, cataract, retinal capillary fragility, glaucoma, infections, inflammation, dry eye, and retinopathies; veterinary preparations, namely, veterinary preparations for the treatment of eye diseases in animals; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely, dietary and nutritional supplements for improving eye sight; food for babies; plasters, namely, medical and surgical plasters; materials for dressing, namely, medical and surgical dressing; materials for stopping teeth; dental wax; disinfectants, namely, disinfectants for hygienic purpose, disinfectants for medical instruments, disinfectants for sanitary purposes; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | [ Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in eye surgery, namely, intra-ocular lenses for surgical implantation, artificial eyes, cannulaes, drainage tubes for medical purposes, injection instruments with and without needles for medical purposes, lasers for medical purposes, ophthalmometers, ophtalmoscopes, radiological apparatus for medical purposes, eye sight testing apparatus; thermometers for medical purposes, ultraviolet ray lamps for medical purposes; advanced diagnostic instruments to be used in the field of ophthalmology, namely, medical diagnostic apparatus for the detection of eye disease and eye conditions; suture materials ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising, business management, business administration, providing office functions ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, scientific and technical consulting and research services relating to pharmaceutical products to be used in the field of ophthalmology, surgical equipment based on highly sophisticated technologies to be used in the field of ophthalmology, and advanced diagnostic instruments to be used in the field of ophthalmology; industrial analysis and research services, namely, chemical analysis, materials testing and analysis, computer systems analysis, industrial research in the field of ophthalmology; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.I.F.I. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by S.I.F.I. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SIFI SPA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIFI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |