USPTO serial 79049133
TOTAL TOOLING ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTAL TOOLING ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Parts of machines and machine tools, namely, extruded hard metal rods, saw teeth, paper cutting machines, tools for mechanical forming, various wear parts made of hard metal, cermet, ceramics or super hard materials, tool systems, clamping tools for tool and the work piece griping; automatic control mechanisms for metal-cutting machine tools; all named products as parts of machines, cutting machine tools for processing of materials, particularly turning, milling, burring and tapping tools, drills, milling cutters, side milling cutters, saws, reamers, countersinking tools; parts of such tools, particularly exchangeable cutting bodies made of high-speed steel, hard metal, cermet, synthetic, ceramics or other cutting materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture for warehouse operations, particularly tool cabinets, high rack warehouse systems and work benches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical and application consulting offered by an engineer relating to cutting machine tools for processing of materials, particularly turning, burring and tapping tools, drills, milling cutters, side milling cutters, saws, reaming and countersinking tools, parts of such tools, particularly exchangeable cutting bodies made of high-speed steel, hard metal, cermet, synthetic, ceramics or other cutting materials, extruded hard metal rods, saw teeth, paper cutters, tools for mechanical forming, various wear parts made of hard metal, cermet, synthetic, ceramics or other super hard materials, tooling systems, clamping tools for tool and the work piece griping; conception and development of programs and software, particularly for logistics (tool management systems), control automated systems as well as all operational functional areas, also in connection with the Internet (E-Commerce); technical consulting in the field of information technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |