Drawing for SAACKE GROUP

USPTO serial 79049195

SAACKE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3787528Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 11, 2010
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SAACKE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the working of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials; machines for the processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond and ceramics; machines for working wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond and ceramics; machine tools, namely, metal working machine tools, high-speed steel working machine tools, carbide working machine tools, aluminum working machine tools, namely, machine tools for working metal; tool grinding machines; hydraulic and electronic pneumatic controllers and regulators for machines for the working and processing of materials and for machine tools; power driven chipping tools; power driven non-chipping tools, namely, for chipless removing of pieces from a work piece; power driven rolling tools, power driven hobbing tools, power driven milling tools, power driven grinding tools, power driven reaming tools, power driven broaching tools, power driven slotting tools, power driven ramming tools, power driven drilling tools, power driven cutting tools; replacement parts for the afore-mentioned goodsACTIVE—
009[ Blank electric, electronic, magnetic and optic data carriers; pre-recorded electric, electronic, magnetic and optic data carriers featuring software for machines for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond, ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials; data processor and computers; electric and electronic controllers for the working and processing of metal, high-speed steel, carbide, aluminum, of wood, glass, plastics, polycrystalline diamond,ceramics, as well as of substitutes and compounds of the afore-mentioned materials, and machine tools; computer programs for the operation of data processing equipment and computers, and for the operation of the afore-mentioned controllers and regulators; replacement parts for the afore-mentioned goods ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 16, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 6, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 8, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 11, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 22, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 14, 2009PBPOWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Dec 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance