Drawing for CHRISTIANIA BIKES

USPTO serial 79049209

CHRISTIANIA BIKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTIANIA BIKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, including bicycles in various designs; bicycle trailers; hoods for vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
016Printed publications, cardboard and paper goods, including postcards and posters and artistic products such as paintings and photographsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 24, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance