USPTO serial 79049228
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Mesiti, Esq.
Nicholas Mesiti, Esq. HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatuses, devices and instruments, namely, switchgear for AC/DC traction power supply system and autotransformer systems; electrical signaling, measurement, counting, recording, monitoring, control and switching devices for use with railroads, namely, electrical converters, rectifiers, switch boxes, power controllers, power switches, low voltage power supplies; parts of the above-mentioned apparatuses, devices and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |