Drawing for RHINO ROSES

USPTO serial 79049260

RHINO ROSES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHINO ROSES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen Collen IP Intellectual Property Law, P.C.80 South Highland AvenueThe Holyoke-Manhattan BuildingOssining, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Ornamental plant cultivation products (natural plants and flowers) in particular roses, as well as parts, cuttings, seeds and other original materials thereofSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 27, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance