Drawing for CIEMAT

USPTO serial 79049269

CIEMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3623101Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2009
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIEMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research and development; scientific research; industrial research in the field of energy and environmental technology; design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 19, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance