USPTO serial 79049289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Huntsman Textile Effects (Belgium) BVBA
BE
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Textile Effects (Belgium) BVBA
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Basel, CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Huntsman Textile Effects (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Textile Effects (Switzerland) GmbH
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
CH
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman Advanced Materials (Switzerland) GmbH
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals used in industry and auxiliary chemical products for use in the textile industry, namely, wetting and penetration accelerants for textile wet processing; chemical products for the finishing and coloring of textiles, namely, penetration accelerants for dyes, wetting and penetration accelerants for wet textile processing, leveling agents, namely, chemical products for the improvement of even spread of dyestuffs in water when dyeing textile; emulsifying agents, dispersive agents, mercerizing agents; surface active compounds for general use in the industrial arts, namely, softening agent, disassembling agents | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |