USPTO serial 79049335
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
F-19100 Brive, FR
F-19100 Brive, FR
Brive, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Corpus
Deborah L. Corpus CHRISMAN GALLO TOCHTROP LLC6509 BRECKSVILLE ROAD #31550Independence, OH 44131-4854United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photosensitive tubes, namely, photomultipliers; image intensifier tubes for low-light levels; image intensifier tube with aperture scanning; image dissector tubes; photoelectric cells; diodes or triodes; electron multipliers; microchannel wafers; optical components or interfaces making use of glass drawing technologies for signal transfer; neutron or gamma sensors; electronic equipment associated with these technologies, namely, day/night digital cameras; photon detection counter units; time-of-flight spectrometer units | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Optical and optoelectronic apparatus, components and devices for medical imaging and analysis, namely, optic glass fibers for endoscopes, special photomultipliers for PET, SPECT and X-RAY for use in medical and dental imaging systems, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization plates for use in the field of medical analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering evaluation, namely, quality, design and performance review of optoelectronic, optical and electronic goods and services, analysis and research in the fields of science, technology and industry specifically related to optoelectronic and optical in the fields of medical imaging and analysis, to image intensifying in the field of night vision applications and to electronics in the field of day/night digital cameras; engineering services, namely, development of microchannel wafer, optical components and interfaces employing glass drawing technologies and making possible signal transfers, all conducted by engineers; design services, namely, new products in the optoelectronic, optical, electronic microchannel wafer, optical components and interface fields that employ glass drawing technologies and make possible signal transfers, also conducted by engineers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |