USPTO serial 79049392
ROBWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3666876Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2009
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Fieschko
Craig A. Fieschko DeWitt Ross & Stevens SC2 E. Mifflin St., 6th FloorMadison, WI 53703-2865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Monitoring equipment, namely, direct and indirect load weighing systems comprised of weighing instruments for use in monitoring loads versus safe working limits; monitoring equipment, namely, a microprocessor-based central processing unit in the nature of a circuit board assembly and an operator digital display console in the nature of a video display monitor for both local and remote data display; monitoring equipment, namely, angle sensors in the nature of inclinometers, electronic level sensors for sensing angles and inclination, theodolites, and protractors for measuring angles and geometry of machinery components relative to the horizon and each other; monitoring equipment, namely, length sensors in the nature of encoders for measuring the extension of telescoping booms being parts of machines; monitoring equipment, namely, limit-sensing electric and electronic proximity switches for determining maximum and minimum travel limits; optional computer printers; optional signal conditioning units for converting transducer outputs to voltages, current-loops, or frequencies, for industrial process control; electrical interconnecting cables, for hoists, cranes and loaders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LSI Robway Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Robway Crane Safety Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Robway Crane Safety Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Robway Crane Safety Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ROBWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |