Drawing for ASCEND EÓLICA

USPTO serial 79049424

ASCEND EÓLICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASCEND EÓLICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy L. Zawaski

Tracy L. Zawaski Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward AvenueSuite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037construction of wind and solar park machinery and installations; construction services; repair and maintenance services for wind and solar park machinery and installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance