USPTO serial 79049438
AERO - SYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3679875Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AERO - SYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Transportable metal constructions elements, namely, rotating and tilting prefabricated platforms, turntables floors, floating general purpose metal containers for transport, metal profiled bar construction in the nature of girders of metal; smooth or grooved metal pipes and tubes; metal pipes and pipe coupling; ironmongery and small items of metal hardware, namely, hooks, padlocks, safety washers, nuts and bolts; armour plating; metal containers, namely, metal containers for liquid fuel and metal containers for liquefied gas under pressure | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Motors for aircraft; propulsion and transmission mechanisms for air vehicles, namely, transmission belts; compressed air pumps and compressed air machines; hydraulic airplane motors and turbines; pumps as parts of machines, engines or motors; pneumatic and hydraulic control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors; hydraulic and pneumatic controls for machines and motors; valves as parts of machines; clack valves and pressure regulators as parts of machines; shaft couplings other than for land vehicles; transmissions for machines; conveyors; cranes as lifting apparatus; power jacks; machine tools, namely, turning machines and filling machines; electric knife; agricultural machines, namely, motorized cultivators | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Aircraft and their structural components; land vehicles for special uses, namely, vehicles equipped with systems for extinguishing fires, vehicles equipped with systems for meteorological studies and measurements, military transport vehicles equipped with facilities for carrying out combat mission, military vehicles equipped with artillery installations, military transport vehicles equipped with medical assistance facilities and the structural parts of the land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air, or water, namely, motorized parachute and motor- scooter; hydraulic circuits and pneumatic tires for vehicles; shaft couplings for land vehicles; transmission for land vehicles; motors for land vehicles; trailers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.C. AEROSTAR S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by S.C. AEROSTAR S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by S.C. AEROSTAR S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named AERO - SYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |