USPTO serial 79049507
CARODORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3643665Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARODORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ES
ES
ES
ES
ES
ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARMEN RODRIGUEZ MENDEZ
- Other trademarks owned by CARMEN RODRIGUEZ MENDEZ
- Other trademarks owned by CARMEN RODRIGUEZ MENDEZ
- Other trademarks owned by LUIS ANTONIO DIEZ PEREZ
- Other trademarks owned by LUIS ANTONIO DIEZ PEREZ
- Other trademarks owned by LUIS ANTONIO DIEZ PEREZ
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CARODORUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |