Drawing for ATATAB

USPTO serial 79049556

ATATAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATATAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield K&L Gates LLP630 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, a drug delivery system comprising oral tablets for drugs, vitamins and dietary supplements for both human and veterinary use; food for babies; plasters and materials for medical dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental waxABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 5, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance