Drawing for ORIOL ROSSELL

USPTO serial 79049596

ORIOL ROSSELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3692662Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 6, 2009
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIOL ROSSELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Eisenhart

John C. Eisenhart Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Rd., iith FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine, sparkling cava wines and sparkling winesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 24, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2009PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 12, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Sep 16, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 15, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance