Drawing for SELFISH

USPTO serial 79049599

SELFISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELFISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025All kinds of clothing made of various materials including socks, hats, scarves, footwear, excluding the clothings for the purpose of protectionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 19, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 15, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 6, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 4, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance