USPTO serial 79049619
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
F-33180 SAINT-ESTEPHE, FR
F-33180 SAINT-ESTEPHE, FR
F-33180 SAINT-ESTEPHE, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines of guaranteed label of origin * from the Saint Estephe region of France made in accordance with specific standards * | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |