USPTO serial 79049642
COMMEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3712150Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with COMMEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salzburg, AT
Salzburg, AT
AT
AT
AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah I. Cohen
Sarah I. Cohen Lombard & Geliebter LLP305 Broadway Fl 7New York, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images, namely, networked intercoms for Mass Transit, Security, Parking, Emergency, Medical, Heavy Duty Industries, Lifts, Campuses, Airports and Tunnels | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Digital transmission of speech, images and data on a uniform digital service, namely, by telecommunication means | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological services, namely, designing and planning of networked intercom equipment; industrial research services in the field of networking and processing of speech systems; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commend International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Commend Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Commend Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Commend Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Commend Leasing GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMMEND
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |