Drawing for Serial No. 79049650

USPTO serial 79049650

Serial No. 79049650

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79049650?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Concrete vibrators; construction machines, namely rammers, diamond core drills; machines, namely plate compactors; floor cutting-off machines; blaster (machines for spraying air, in order to make it easy for powder stored in a hopper of a machine to flow) for installing in loading-unloading machines and apparatus; knockers (machines for striking a hopper in order to make it easy for powder stored in a hopper of a machine to flow) for installing in loading-unloading machines and apparatus; construction machines and apparatuses, namely concrete construction machines; engines for motive power machines and apparatuses; pneumatic and hydraulic machines and apparatus, construction machines; AC generators and DC generatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Controllers for motors; transformers; inverter for concrete machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance