USPTO serial 79049660
CHÂTEAU TRONQUOY-LALANDE SAINT-ESTÈPHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with CHÂTEAU TRONQUOY-LALANDE SAINT-ESTÈPHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SCEA DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
FR
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
SCEA DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
SAINT-ESTEPHE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | [ Wines of guaranteed label of origin from applicant's winery ] * Wines from the Saint-Estèphe region of France made in accordance with adopted standards * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCEA DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE; DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
- Other trademarks owned by SCEA DU CHATEAU TRONQUOY LALANDE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHÂTEAU TRONQUOY-LALANDE SAINT-ESTÈPHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |