Drawing for COLOMB & BALMER

USPTO serial 79049672

COLOMB & BALMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOMB & BALMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20037-3202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Wristwatches, clocks, small clocks, fob watches, chronometric instruments; clock and watch casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 5, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 25, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 31, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 6, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 1, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance