USPTO serial 79049754
CBR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3722446Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ali R. Latifi
Ali R. Latifi Tucker & Latifi, LLP160 East 84th StreetSuite 5ENew York, NY 10028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys; goods made of precious metals and precious metal alloys, namely, gold, silver and platinum jewelry, precious stones necklaces, rings, earrings, studs, bracelets, brooches and pendants, barettes made of precious metals; and horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Repair of jewellery ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Jewelry design services ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colleen B. Rosenblat
- Other trademarks owned by Colleen B. Rosenblat
- Other trademarks owned by Colleen B. Rosenblat
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CBR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |