USPTO serial 79049764
X-CELLIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3591406Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X-CELLIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | METALWORKING, NAMELY, METAL FORGING, METAL CUTTING, METAL DRILLING, METAL PLANNING, METAL TURNING, METAL HONING, METAL SURFACE REFINING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING OF PERSONNEL IN THE FIELD OF METAL PROCESSING AND MACHINE PLANTS FOR OTHERS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | CONSULTANCY SERVICES OF AN ENGINEER FOR CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING METALLURGICAL PLANTS, STEEL MILLS, ROLLING MILLS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY IN RELATION TO THE OPERATION OF MACHINES FOR THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY, MACHINES FOR THE STEEL MILL INDUSTRY, CONTINUOUS CASTING PLANTS, ROLLING MACHINES, FORGING MACHINES, PRESSING MACHINES, CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY, MACHINES FOR THE STEEL MILL INDUSTRY,CONTINUOUS CASTING PLANTS, ROLLING MACHINES, FORGING MACHINES, PRESSING MACHINES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMS Demag AG
- Other trademarks owned by SMS Demag AG
- Other trademarks owned by SMS Demag AG
- Other trademarks owned by SMS Siemag Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named X-CELLIZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |