Drawing for BODYCRUZER

USPTO serial 79049819

BODYCRUZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3561347Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 13, 2009
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BODYCRUZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Johns

Michael D. Johns The Procter & Gamble CompanyOne P&G PlazaC9Cincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electrically operated shaving, beard and hair cutting appliances, namely, electric hair clippers and trimmers; cases for storing and holding shavers and trimmers and attachments for shavers and trimmers, namely, distance combs and protective caps; parts for shavers and trimmers, namely, shear foils, cutter blocks and shear headsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 13, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 3, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 28, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance