Drawing for 1080P

USPTO serial 79049830

1080P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1080P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic apparatus for receiving, transmitting, processing and reproducing sound, images and/or data; magnetic and optical data carriers; sound and image carriers; data processing apparatus and computers; parts of those apparatus and instruments intended to receive, transmit, process and reproduce sound, images and data; softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance