Drawing for MATISS

USPTO serial 79049836

MATISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029ready-made salads, namely, garden, vegetableSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Flours, salts, condiments, namely, soya bean pasteSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry produces, namely, vegetables, fresh herbsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 27, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 27, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 19, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 24, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 15, 2009ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 15, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 15, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 15, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 22, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance