USPTO serial 79049838
GLOBO LIGHTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBO LIGHTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric lighting devices for indoor and outdoor use, namely lamps, lights, namely, halogen spot lights, reflector spot lights, electric spot lights, wall lights, ceiling lights, table lights in the nature of lamps, floor lights in the nature of lamps, children lights in the nature of electric night lights and children's lamps, outdoor lights in the nature of lamps and LED lighting fixtures for outdoor use, indoor lights in the nature of lamps and LED lighting fixtures for indoor use, energy saving lights in the nature of energy saving light bulbs, office lights in the nature of desk lamps and ceiling lamps, down lights in the nature of electric track lighting units, wall lamps, lamp hanging supports not included in other classes in the nature of light fixtures for lamps, fluorescent lamps, table lamps, pendant lamps, indoor lamps and outdoor lamps, flashlights, arc lamps, ceiling lamps, sockets for electric lights, gas lamps, filaments for electric lamps, miners' lamps, laboratory lamps, electric lamps, lamp glasses, lamp mantles, lamp globes in the nature of glass lantern globes, lamp chimneys, lamp cylinders, lamp shades, lampshade holders, germicidal lamps for purifying air, oil lamps, projector lamps, reflectors for lamps, headlights for motor vehicles, safety lamps, floor lamps, street lamps, torches, namely electric torches for lighting, ultraviolet lamps, not for medical purposes, hand lanterns, Chinese lanterns, lanterns, chandeliers, fluorescent tubes for lighting purposes, electric track lighting units for living space and landscape lighting installations, electric lights for Christmas trees, electric discharge tubes for lighting, electric bulbs for lighting, light diffusers, diving lamps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |