Drawing for DE MAJO

USPTO serial 79049845

DE MAJO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3731514Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2009
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE MAJO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Glass sold as an integral component of lamps, chandeliers, lighting lamps, small Venetian lamps and street lampsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Glass made recipients, namely, milkwhite drinking glasses, glasses for lamps, namely, stained glass, beverage glassware, knick-knacks, namely, glass made art works in the nature of figurines, carved figures, namely, vases, bowls made of glass, glass bottles sold empty and drinking glassesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 5, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 7, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2009PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance