USPTO serial 79049848
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dental composite materials; dental filling materials containing titanium | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Dentures and parts of dentures | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of dental prosthetics; treatment of dental prosthesis frameworks for dental laboratories, namely, designing and milling of frameworks and copings and applying medical coatings to dental prosthetics; dental laboratories; dental technician services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 28, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |