Drawing for AKYAPAK

USPTO serial 79049849

AKYAPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3524450Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AKYAPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mariana Paula Noli

Mariana Paula Noli NOLI IP Solutions PC5030 Bella Collina StreetOceanside, CA 92056UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machine tools for cutting, punching, cropping, bending, rolling and shaping metals, namely, mechanical presses, bending machines, pneumatic controls for machines, engines and motors, plasma etching machines, machines for manufacturing metal strips, namely, continuous metal casting machines, metal sawing machines, metal cutting machines, metal welding machines, namely, electric arc welding machines, gas welding machines, laser welding machines, lathes being machine tools, machine parts for metalworking machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 27, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 27, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 1, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance