USPTO serial 79049915
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumeries [, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, namely, eye make-up and facial make-up, non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, moisturizers, texturizers and toners; bath gel, shower gel, foam bath and personal deodorants; hair lotions, dentifrices, toilet soaps ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |